Find the engine's idea
Every position here comes from a real blitz game, at the exact spot where players at a rating reliably choose one plan and Stockfish argues for a different one. Find the engine's move, and the coach explains the gap once you do.
Start here
43% of 1100s miss 2.1 pawns
Drill 1 · 1100 · different plan
opening · 13
43% of 1100s miss 2.1 pawns
43% of 1700s miss 3.9 pawns
44% of 1100s miss 1.7 pawns
21% of 1100s miss 3.6 pawns
26% of 1100s miss 1.8 pawns
58% of 1100s miss 1.6 pawns
middlegame · 23
70% of 1700s miss 1.9 pawns
29% of 1100s miss 11.5 pawns
42% of 1700s miss 8.2 pawns
90% of 1700s miss 2.7 pawns
25% of 1100s miss 14.5 pawns
51% of 1100s miss 2.5 pawns
endgame · 4
How these drills are made
We know this because Maia, a neural network trained on millions of human games, tells us what players at each rating actually play, and how often. Stockfish then tells us what the move really costs, and what it would rather do instead. When those two disagree about the whole plan, not just one move, the position lands in this room.
You get the board and one fact: the percentage of players at a rating who fall for the same pull you are about to feel. Your job is to find the engine's move. Play the crowd's move and you will hear exactly why it falls short, with the punishment line. Play anything else and Stockfish prices it honestly on the spot. Hints come from the board itself: the weak squares, the open files, the backward pawns the position is actually about. Solve it, and the engine's whole line plays out with the eval bar open.
The lesson is not the move; it is the disagreement. When a third of players attack on one wing and the engine calmly plays on the other, the gap between those two stories is the thing worth learning, and it is usually about what the position says: which squares are weak, which file matters, which piece is doing three jobs. Every sentence you read here was checked against the board by the machine before it was published.
Batch 1: 40 positions from 1,107 Lichess arena games, filtered from 48,169 candidates. Human probabilities by Maia-2 at 1100, 1400 and 1700; every cost measured by Stockfish at depth 22 and re-verified independently before publishing.